PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUTHX vs. FKDNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUTHX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Shares Fund (MUTHX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUTHX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than FKDNX's 12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MUTHX has underperformed FKDNX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while FKDNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.


MUTHX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
2.86%
6M
4.59%
1Y
12.05%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
7.47%

FKDNX

1D
-1.14%
1M
5.66%
YTD
12.20%
6M
10.54%
1Y
28.27%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
18.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUTHX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUTHX
Franklin Mutual Shares Fund
2.86%11.83%12.42%13.86%-7.11%19.27%-4.34%23.20%-9.06%8.39%
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
12.20%18.59%30.57%44.42%-40.30%12.53%57.68%36.36%2.85%39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MUTHX and FKDNX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1980

0.59

The correlation between MUTHX and FKDNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUTHX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUTHX
MUTHX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MUTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MUTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FKDNX
FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUTHX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Shares Fund (MUTHX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUTHXFKDNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.25

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.43

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

4.46

-0.22

MUTHX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUTHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUTHX and FKDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUTHXFKDNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.44

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.41

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.74

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.67

-0.08

Drawdowns

MUTHX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUTHX drawdown since its inception was -53.53%, roughly equal to the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUTHX and FKDNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUTHXFKDNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.53%

-51.63%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-20.49%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-26.23%

+10.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

-48.28%

+27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

-48.28%

+8.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-1.14%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.52%

-11.25%

+4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

6.57%

-3.76%

Volatility

MUTHX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Mutual Shares Fund (MUTHX) is 2.83%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that MUTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUTHXFKDNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

4.99%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

15.86%

-7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.39%

20.41%

-9.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

26.20%

-10.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

24.61%

-7.70%

MUTHX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUTHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUTHX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

MUTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, less than FKDNX's 9.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
9.95%11.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.43%0.00%0.74%2.92%1.77%3.55%2.46%
MUTHX
Franklin Mutual Shares Fund
7.37%7.58%10.40%5.92%9.67%11.31%3.74%8.08%7.33%6.79%3.74%7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUTHX and FKDNX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKDNX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to MUTHX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUTHX dropped -53.53% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.

FKDNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUTHX and FKDNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer