PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUSQ vs. ROBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUSQ vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSQ achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than ROBO's 29.33% return.


MUSQ

1D
-2.16%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-8.93%
6M
-6.37%
1Y
-4.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ROBO

1D
-0.77%
1M
10.56%
YTD
29.33%
6M
30.40%
1Y
59.43%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSQ vs. ROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MUSQ
MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF
-8.93%19.60%-4.94%1.76%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
29.33%23.71%-1.28%0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSQ and ROBO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2023

0.67

The correlation between MUSQ and ROBO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

MUSQ vs. ROBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MUSQ
ROBO

Communication Services

76.9%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
3.1%

Technology

10.3%
41.9%

Industrials

0.7%
46.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

1.3%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

2.2%

Healthcare

-

4.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

MUSQ
76.9%
ROBO
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MUSQ
12.1%
ROBO
3.1%

Technology

MUSQ
10.3%
ROBO
41.9%

Industrials

MUSQ
0.7%
ROBO
46.8%

Basic Materials

MUSQ

-

ROBO

-

Consumer Defensive

MUSQ

-

ROBO
1.3%

Energy

MUSQ

-

ROBO

-

Financial Services

MUSQ

-

ROBO
2.2%

Healthcare

MUSQ

-

ROBO
4.9%

Real Estate

MUSQ

-

ROBO

-

Utilities

MUSQ

-

ROBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUSQ vs. ROBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSQ
MUSQ Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MUSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSQ vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUSQROBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.43

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

3.44

-3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

13.77

-14.22

MUSQ vs. ROBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the ROBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSQ and ROBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUSQROBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

2.60

-2.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.50

-0.39

Drawdowns

MUSQ vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSQ drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum ROBO drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSQ and ROBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSQROBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.11%

-43.65%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.11%

-17.35%

-5.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.04%

-0.77%

-14.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-12.93%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.43%

4.33%

+5.10%

Volatility

MUSQ vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) is 4.86%, while ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that MUSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSQROBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

7.64%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

18.06%

-4.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

23.01%

-6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

23.63%

-5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

23.16%

-5.30%

MUSQ vs. ROBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSQ has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUSQ vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison

MUSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than ROBO's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUSQ
MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF
0.69%0.63%1.08%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.33%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUSQ and ROBO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBO has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to MUSQ (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSQ dropped -23.11% vs ROBO's -43.65%.

On 1-year performance, ROBO leads with 59.43% vs -4.15% for MUSQ. On fees, MUSQ is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, MUSQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ROBO has performed better with a 59.43% return vs -4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUSQ is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

MUSQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.33% for ROBO.

MUSQ is categorized as Communications Equities, while ROBO is Robotics. MUSQ tracks MUSQ Global Music Industry Index, while ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for MUSQ and 0.95% for ROBO.

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUSQ and ROBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer