PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUSA vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUSA vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSA achieves a 34.13% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 28.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSA has outperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 23.21%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.77% annualized return.


MUSA

1D
-0.44%
1M
-10.61%
YTD
34.13%
6M
36.00%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
32.16%
10Y*
23.21%

SPMO

1D
-1.46%
1M
10.84%
YTD
28.45%
6M
27.50%
1Y
43.92%
3Y*
42.27%
5Y*
23.92%
10Y*
20.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSA vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
34.13%-19.15%41.27%28.20%41.02%53.33%12.06%52.66%-4.63%30.73%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.45%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSA and SPMO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.23

The correlation between MUSA and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUSA vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSA
MUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSA vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUSASPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.44

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

3.47

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

13.52

-10.54

MUSA vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSA and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUSASPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

2.49

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

1.25

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

1.03

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

1.00

-0.23

Drawdowns

MUSA vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSA drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSA and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSASPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.54%

-30.95%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.72%

-12.70%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.54%

-20.13%

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.54%

-22.74%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.54%

-30.95%

-4.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.61%

-1.46%

-9.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-4.60%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.56%

3.26%

+6.30%

Volatility

MUSA vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 7.39%. This indicates that MUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSASPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

7.39%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.83%

14.49%

+14.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.09%

17.70%

+20.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.12%

19.30%

+10.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.18%

20.31%

+10.87%

Dividends

MUSA vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

MUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than SPMO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
0.45%0.53%0.36%0.43%0.45%0.52%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUSA and SPMO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUSA has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to SPMO (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSA dropped -35.54% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUSA and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer