MUR vs. MUSA
MUR (Murphy Oil Corporation) and MUSA (Murphy USA Inc.) are both stocks. MUR operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while MUSA operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, MUR returned 6.54%/yr vs 24.92%/yr for MUSA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MUR vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUR achieves a 26.69% return, which is significantly lower than MUSA's 54.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MUR has underperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 6.54%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 24.92% annualized return.
MUR
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 26.69%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- 1Y
- 59.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.02%
- 10Y*
- 6.54%
MUSA
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 54.70%
- 6M
- 53.60%
- 1Y
- 55.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.75%
- 5Y*
- 35.86%
- 10Y*
- 24.92%
MUR vs. MUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUR Murphy Oil Corporation | 26.69% | 8.68% | -26.77% | 1.98% | 68.50% | 121.37% | -52.74% | 19.48% | -22.09% | 3.41% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 54.70% | -19.15% | 41.27% | 28.20% | 41.02% | 53.33% | 12.06% | 52.66% | -4.63% | 30.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUR and MUSA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2013 | 0.21 |
The correlation between MUR and MUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MUR:
$5.61B
MUSA:
$11.65B
MUR:
$369.23
MUSA:
$28.85
MUR:
0.11
MUSA:
21.58
MUR:
0.00
MUSA:
1.17
MUR:
0.01
MUSA:
0.61
MUR:
0.00
MUSA:
17.68
MUR:
$735.60B
MUSA:
$19.68B
MUR:
$1.73B
MUSA:
$487.10M
MUR:
$329.24B
MUSA:
$1.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUR vs. MUSA — Risk / Return Rank
MUR
MUSA
MUR vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUR | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 2.59 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 5.33 | +3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUR vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUR drawdown since its inception was -92.11%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUR and MUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUR | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.11% | -35.54% | -56.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.26% | -19.72% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.47% | -35.54% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.47% | -35.54% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.10% | -35.54% | -50.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.01% | 0.00% | -19.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.26% | -9.97% | -16.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.43% | 9.58% | -2.15% |
Volatility
MUR vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison
Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) have volatilities of 12.52% and 12.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUR | MUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.52% | 12.62% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.38% | 30.21% | +5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.59% | 39.13% | +8.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.11% | 30.42% | +15.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.34% | 31.33% | +24.01% |
Dividends
MUR vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison
MUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than MUSA's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUR Murphy Oil Corporation | 3.48% | 4.16% | 3.97% | 2.58% | 1.92% | 1.91% | 5.17% | 3.73% | 4.28% | 3.22% | 3.85% | 6.24% |
MUSA Murphy USA Inc. | 0.39% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MUR vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Murphy Oil Corporation and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MUR vs. MUSA - Profitability Comparison
MUR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 733.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MUSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MUR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 733.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.
MUSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 205.20M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
MUR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy Oil Corporation reported a net income of 52.99B and revenue of 733.55B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
MUSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 136.30M and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MUR and MUSA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUSA has higher volatility (12.62%) compared to MUR (12.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUR dropped -92.11% vs MUSA's -35.54%.
MUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUR and MUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer