MUND vs. TDTT

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

MUND (Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF) and TDTT (FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MUND is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while TDTT is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. MUND is actively managed, while TDTT is passively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

MUND vs. TDTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUND achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than TDTT's 1.47% return.

MUND

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: 1.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDTT

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.50%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: 4.87%
• 5Y*: 2.78%
• 10Y*: 3.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUND vs. TDTT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MUND Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF	1.28%	4.34%
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund	1.47%	0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MUND and TDTT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.19

Return for Risk

MUND vs. TDTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDTT

TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 83
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUND vs. TDTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUND	TDTT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	0.69	+0.30

Drawdowns

MUND vs. TDTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUND drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, smaller than the maximum TDTT drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUND and TDTT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUND	TDTT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-6.97%	+2.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.90%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-6.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-6.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-0.47%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-1.60%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MUND	TDTT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.29%	1.86%	+5.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.29%	3.67%	+3.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.29%	3.38%	+3.91%

MUND vs. TDTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MUND and TDTT have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MUND vs. TDTT - Dividend Comparison

MUND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than TDTT's 4.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
MUND Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF	2.81%	1.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDTT FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund	4.56%	4.52%	4.01%	3.88%	6.97%	4.53%	1.15%	1.91%	2.48%	1.88%	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUND and TDTT in my portfolio?

MUND and TDTT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MUND or TDTT?

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUND or TDTT?

MUND and TDTT have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUND or TDTT?

TDTT has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 2.81% for MUND.

What is the main difference between MUND and TDTT?

MUND is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TDTT is Inflation-Protected Bonds.