MUND vs. ESG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MUND (Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF) and ESG (FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MUND is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while ESG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index. MUND is actively managed, while ESG is passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUND charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ESG.

Performance

MUND vs. ESG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUND achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than ESG's 11.33% return.

MUND

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.36%
• 6M: 0.66%
• YTD: 1.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ESG

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: 10.30%
• YTD: 11.33%
• 1Y: 20.61%
• 3Y*: 18.19%
• 5Y*: 11.97%
• 10Y*: 14.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUND vs. ESG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MUND Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF	1.22%	4.41%
ESG FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund	11.33%	5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MUND and ESG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.22

Return for Risk

MUND vs. ESG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ESG

ESG Risk / Return Rank: 67
ESG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ESG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ESG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ESG Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ESG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUND vs. ESG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUND	ESG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.80	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.50	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.39	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.93	—

Drawdowns

MUND vs. ESG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUND drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, smaller than the maximum ESG drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUND and ESG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUND	ESG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-32.53%	+28.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.32%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-1.22%	-0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-5.03%	+3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MUND	ESG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.90%	11.49%	-4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.90%	16.79%	-9.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.90%	18.31%	-11.41%

MUND vs. ESG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ESG's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUND vs. ESG - Dividend Comparison

MUND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than ESG's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ESG FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund	0.88%	0.96%	1.18%	1.10%	1.38%	1.03%	1.33%	1.51%	1.72%	1.52%	0.92%
MUND Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF	3.22%	1.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUND and ESG in my portfolio?

MUND and ESG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MUND or ESG?

On fees, MUND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUND or ESG?

MUND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ESG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUND or ESG?

MUND has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.88% for ESG.

What is the main difference between MUND and ESG?

MUND is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ESG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUND and 0.32% for ESG.