PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUND vs. AUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUND vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUND achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly higher than AUSM's 1.02% return.


MUND

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUSM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUND vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MUND and AUSM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUND vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MUND vs. AUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUNDAUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

4.02

-3.03

Drawdowns

MUND vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUND drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUND and AUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNDAUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-0.42%

-3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

0.00%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-0.09%

-1.79%

Volatility

MUND vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNDAUSMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.29%

0.73%

+6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

0.73%

+6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.29%

0.73%

+6.56%

MUND vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MUND and AUSM have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MUND vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison

MUND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than AUSM's 2.39% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MUND and AUSM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUND and AUSM have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

MUND has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.39% for AUSM.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Allspring.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUND and AUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer