MULL vs. FBL
MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) and FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MULL returned 6074.28% vs -29.78% for FBL. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MULL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for FBL.
Performance
MULL vs. FBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MULL achieves a 936.86% return, which is significantly higher than FBL's -19.72% return.
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBL
- 1D
- 8.48%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- -19.72%
- 6M
- -15.34%
- 1Y
- -29.78%
- 3Y*
- 33.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | -19.72% | 0.50% | -1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULL and FBL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.32 |
MULL vs. FBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MULL
FBL
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MULL
FBL
-
Basic Materials
MULL
-
FBL
-
Communication Services
MULL
-
FBL
Consumer Cyclical
MULL
-
FBL
-
Consumer Defensive
MULL
-
FBL
-
Energy
MULL
-
FBL
-
Financial Services
MULL
-
FBL
-
Healthcare
MULL
-
FBL
-
Industrials
MULL
-
FBL
-
Real Estate
MULL
-
FBL
-
Utilities
MULL
-
FBL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULL vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank
MULL
FBL
MULL vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MULL | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 46.71 | -0.42 | +47.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.02 | -0.22 | +7.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 0.97 | +0.92 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 116.34 | -0.49 | +116.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 390.40 | -0.91 | +391.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MULL | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.71 | -0.42 | +47.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.45 | 1.12 | +6.33 |
Drawdowns
MULL vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULL drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than FBL's maximum drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULL and FBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULL | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -61.15% | -11.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.09% | -61.03% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -61.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -47.97% | +47.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -16.41% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.79% | 32.76% | -16.97% |
Volatility
MULL vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a higher volatility of 55.41% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) at 17.63%. This indicates that MULL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULL | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 55.41% | 17.63% | +37.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.59% | 53.15% | +52.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.38% | 70.42% | +61.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 71.06% | +65.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.22% | 71.06% | +65.16% |
MULL vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MULL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MULL vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison
MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FBL's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | 2.58% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 51.58% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULL and FBL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to FBL (17.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MULL dropped -72.29% vs FBL's -61.15%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs -29.78% for FBL. On fees, FBL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, FBL has been the lower-risk option at 17.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs -29.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
FBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MULL and 1.15% for FBL.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MULL and FBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer