MU vs. GMED
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) and GMED (Globus Medical, Inc.) are both stocks. MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while GMED operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, MU returned 54.18%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for GMED. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MU vs. GMED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 243.32% return, which is significantly higher than GMED's -10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed GMED with an annualized return of 54.18%, while GMED has yielded a comparatively lower 12.07% annualized return.
MU
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 183.94%
- YTD
- 243.32%
- 1Y
- 687.66%
- 3Y*
- 149.71%
- 5Y*
- 66.39%
- 10Y*
- 54.18%
GMED
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -17.32%
- YTD
- -10.54%
- 1Y
- 36.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
MU vs. GMED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 243.32% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
GMED Globus Medical, Inc. | -10.54% | 5.56% | 55.21% | -28.25% | 2.87% | 10.70% | 10.77% | 36.04% | 5.30% | 65.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and GMED is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.28 |
The correlation between MU and GMED shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MU:
$1.11T
GMED:
$10.53B
MU:
$44.42
GMED:
$4.28
MU:
22.05
GMED:
18.23
MU:
0.08
GMED:
0.19
MU:
12.33
GMED:
3.45
MU:
11.10
GMED:
2.28
MU:
$90.27B
GMED:
$3.10B
MU:
$65.51B
GMED:
$1.58B
MU:
$44.96B
GMED:
$803.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. GMED — Risk / Return Rank
MU
GMED
MU vs. GMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | GMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.21 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.23 | 1.60 | +21.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 83.25 | 3.87 | +79.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. GMED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than GMED's maximum drawdown of -47.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and GMED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | GMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -47.91% | -50.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -22.10% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -44.40% | -13.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -47.91% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | -47.91% | -9.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.29% | -19.32% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.07% | -15.33% | -42.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.43% | 9.13% | -0.70% |
Volatility
MU vs. GMED - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 33.63% compared to Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) at 13.69%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | GMED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.63% | 13.69% | +19.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.19% | 25.33% | +36.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.68% | 49.46% | +26.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.75% | 38.27% | +16.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.65% | 35.68% | +14.97% |
Dividends
MU vs. GMED - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while GMED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMED Globus Medical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Financials
MU vs. GMED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and Globus Medical, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MU vs. GMED - Profitability Comparison
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
GMED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 759.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
GMED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported an operating income of 150.39M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
GMED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Globus Medical, Inc. reported a net income of 124.30M and revenue of 759.85M, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and GMED have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to GMED (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs GMED's -47.91%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and GMED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer