PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTYY vs. NVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTYY vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTYY achieves a -33.50% return, which is significantly lower than NVD's -23.92% return.


MTYY

1D
-2.19%
1M
-14.92%
YTD
-33.50%
6M
-36.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVD

1D
3.23%
1M
15.01%
YTD
-23.92%
6M
-22.14%
1Y
-53.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTYY vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MTYY
GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF
-33.50%-55.60%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
-23.92%-10.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MTYY and NVD is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTYY vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NVD
NVD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTYY vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTYYNVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

MTYY vs. NVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTYY vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTYY drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTYY and NVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTYYNVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.47%

-99.26%

+28.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.47%

-98.98%

+28.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.29%

-81.90%

+30.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.42%

Volatility

MTYY vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTYYNVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.74%

71.16%

-37.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.74%

92.48%

-58.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.74%

92.48%

-58.74%

MTYY vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MTYY vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

MTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 216.69%, more than NVD's 15.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MTYY
GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF
216.69%48.98%0.00%0.00%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
15.54%11.83%8.68%15.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTYY and NVD have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MTYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MTYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.

MTYY has the higher dividend yield at 216.69%, compared with 15.54% for NVD.

MTYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MTYY and 1.50% for NVD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTYY and NVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer