MTUM vs. JMOM
MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MTUM returned 14.96%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for JMOM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MTUM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
MTUM vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 30.30% return, which is significantly higher than JMOM's 22.57% return.
MTUM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 30.30%
- 6M
- 29.99%
- 1Y
- 40.55%
- 3Y*
- 34.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.19%
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 22.57%
- 6M
- 21.71%
- 1Y
- 36.34%
- 3Y*
- 28.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 30.30% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 3.23% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.57% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTUM and JMOM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between MTUM and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
MTUM vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MTUM
JMOM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
MTUM
JMOM
Industrials
MTUM
JMOM
Financial Services
MTUM
JMOM
Communication Services
MTUM
JMOM
Healthcare
MTUM
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
MTUM
JMOM
Energy
MTUM
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
MTUM
JMOM
Real Estate
MTUM
JMOM
Basic Materials
MTUM
JMOM
Utilities
MTUM
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTUM vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
MTUM
JMOM
MTUM vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTUM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.45 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 4.64 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | 21.99 | -7.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTUM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.55 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.87 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.82 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
MTUM vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum JMOM drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTUM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -34.31% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -7.87% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -19.51% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.28% | -28.26% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -0.35% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -6.31% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 1.66% | +1.23% |
Volatility
MTUM vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 7.67% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) at 4.56%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTUM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.67% | 4.56% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 11.56% | +4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.08% | 14.31% | +4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 18.65% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 20.13% | +0.90% |
MTUM vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MTUM vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than JMOM's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.72% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, MTUM and JMOM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MTUM has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to JMOM (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.24% vs 14.96% for MTUM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.24% return vs 14.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.
JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTUM and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer