PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTZ vs. HDGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTZ vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -46.88% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 5.43% return.


MSTZ

1D
14.02%
1M
86.49%
YTD
-46.88%
6M
-23.06%
1Y
94.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDGE

1D
2.55%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.59%
1Y
-0.65%
3Y*
-5.06%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*
-14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTZ vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
-46.88%-38.95%-94.26%
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
5.43%1.50%-8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTZ and HDGE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTZ vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

HDGE
HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTZ vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTZHDGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.01

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

-0.05

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

-0.11

+2.45

MSTZ vs. HDGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the HDGE Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTZ and HDGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTZHDGEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

-0.04

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.53

-0.67

+0.14

Drawdowns

MSTZ vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than HDGE's maximum drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and HDGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTZHDGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.36%

-93.88%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.89%

-12.26%

-72.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.14%

-93.08%

-5.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-70.11%

-24.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.30%

6.16%

+34.14%

Volatility

MSTZ vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a higher volatility of 37.49% compared to AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) at 6.41%. This indicates that MSTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTZHDGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.49%

6.41%

+31.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

125.82%

12.81%

+113.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

140.34%

18.33%

+122.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

170.37%

24.18%

+146.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

170.37%

23.56%

+146.81%

MSTZ vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTZ vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison

MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
3.32%3.50%7.83%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%
MSTZ
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTZ and HDGE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (37.49%) compared to HDGE (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTZ dropped -99.36% vs HDGE's -93.88%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 94.24% vs -0.65% for HDGE. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 94.24% return vs -0.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

They also come from different issuers: REX and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 3.36% for HDGE.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTZ and HDGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer