MSTZ vs. HDGE
MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTZ returned 94.24% vs -0.65% for HDGE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.
Performance
MSTZ vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTZ achieves a -46.88% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 5.43% return.
MSTZ
- 1D
- 14.02%
- 1M
- 86.49%
- YTD
- -46.88%
- 6M
- -23.06%
- 1Y
- 94.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -14.77%
MSTZ vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -46.88% | -38.95% | -94.26% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 5.43% | 1.50% | -8.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTZ and HDGE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTZ vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank
MSTZ
HDGE
MSTZ vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.01 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | -0.05 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.35 | -0.11 | +2.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | -0.04 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | -0.67 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
MSTZ vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTZ drawdown since its inception was -99.36%, which is greater than HDGE's maximum drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTZ and HDGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.36% | -93.88% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | -12.26% | -72.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.14% | -93.08% | -5.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -70.11% | -24.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.30% | 6.16% | +34.14% |
Volatility
MSTZ vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a higher volatility of 37.49% compared to AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) at 6.41%. This indicates that MSTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTZ | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.49% | 6.41% | +31.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 125.82% | 12.81% | +113.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.34% | 18.33% | +122.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.37% | 24.18% | +146.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.37% | 23.56% | +146.81% |
MSTZ vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTZ vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison
MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.32% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTZ and HDGE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.49%) compared to HDGE (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTZ dropped -99.36% vs HDGE's -93.88%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 94.24% vs -0.65% for HDGE. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 94.24% return vs -0.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
They also come from different issuers: REX and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTZ and 3.36% for HDGE.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTZ and HDGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer