MSSS vs. VO
MSSS (Monarch Select Subsector ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - MSSS tracks the Monarch Select Subsector Index while VO tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MSSS returned 19.87% vs 18.13% for VO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSSS charges 1.43%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
MSSS vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSSS achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.05% return.
MSSS
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 12.62%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 19.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
MSSS vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSSS Monarch Select Subsector ETF | 12.62% | 10.31% | 9.27% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.05% | 11.62% | 9.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSSS and VO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MSSS and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSSS vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
MSSS
VO
MSSS vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Select Subsector ETF (MSSS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSSS | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 2.23 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | 8.50 | -0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSSS | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.48 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.50 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
MSSS vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSSS drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSSS and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSSS | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -58.87% | +39.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | -8.17% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.45% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -7.86% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.14% | +0.44% |
Volatility
MSSS vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Monarch Select Subsector ETF (MSSS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) have volatilities of 3.13% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSSS | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 2.99% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 9.21% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 12.34% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 17.59% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 18.95% | -2.91% |
MSSS vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSSS has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSSS vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
MSSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than VO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSSS Monarch Select Subsector ETF | 0.34% | 0.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSSS and VO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSSS has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to VO (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSSS dropped -19.14% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 1-year performance, MSSS leads with 19.87% vs 18.13% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSSS has performed better with a 19.87% return vs 18.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.43% for MSSS.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.34% for MSSS.
MSSS tracks Monarch Select Subsector Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.43% for MSSS and 0.03% for VO.
MSSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSSS and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer