MSOX vs. MSTZ
MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSOX returned -44.33% vs 159.07% for MSTZ. Their -0.19 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MSOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
MSOX vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -49.55% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -30.44% return.
MSOX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -27.56%
- 6M
- -30.25%
- YTD
- -49.55%
- 1Y
- -44.33%
- 3Y*
- -66.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -74.69%
MSTZ
- 1D
- 8.95%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- 6M
- -24.16%
- YTD
- -30.44%
- 1Y
- 159.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -86.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.60M | $4.46M | $7.39M | |
| $101.73M | $133.33M | $177.41M |
MSOX vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | -49.55% | -51.20% | -79.23% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -30.44% | -38.95% | -94.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOX and MSTZ is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOX vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
MSOX
MSTZ
MSOX vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSOX | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.28 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 2.44 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 4.53 | -5.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSOX vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOX | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.75% | -99.38% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | -84.89% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.67% | -97.63% | -2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.19% | -94.63% | +5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.34% | 45.62% | +16.72% |
Volatility
MSOX vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) is 25.51%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that MSOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOX | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.51% | 37.86% | -12.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 110.30% | 134.52% | -24.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 217.82% | 150.23% | +67.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 166.50% | 169.87% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 166.50% | 169.87% | -3.37% |
MSOX vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOX vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSOX nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOX and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to MSOX (25.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 159.07% vs -44.33% for MSOX. On fees, MSOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MSOX has been the lower-risk option at 25.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 159.07% return vs -44.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSOX and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MSOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSOX and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer