MSOX vs. GSST

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and GSST (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while GSST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSOX returned -67.24%/yr vs 5.47%/yr for GSST. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MSOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for GSST.

Performance

MSOX vs. GSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -45.54% return, which is significantly lower than GSST's 2.05% return.

MSOX

• 1D: -8.27%
• 1M: -21.29%
• 6M: -48.20%
• YTD: -45.54%
• 1Y: -16.72%
• 3Y*: -67.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSST

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 1.88%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 1Y: 4.45%
• 3Y*: 5.47%
• 5Y*: 3.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOX vs. GSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	-45.54%	-51.20%	-87.32%	-39.26%	-76.29%
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF	2.05%	5.20%	6.01%	6.08%	0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOX and GSST is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022	-0.02

The correlation between MSOX and GSST shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to -0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSOX vs. GSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOX

MSOX Risk / Return Rank: 19
MSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
MSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
MSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
MSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
MSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

GSST

GSST Risk / Return Rank: 99
GSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
GSST Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOX vs. GSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSOX	GSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	7.69	-7.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	15.91	-14.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	3.76	-2.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	28.93	-29.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.28	178.47	-178.75

MSOX vs. GSST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the GSST Sharpe Ratio of 7.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOX and GSST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSOX vs. GSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than GSST's maximum drawdown of -3.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and GSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOX	GSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.75%	-3.51%	-96.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.89%	-0.15%	-84.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.83%	-0.25%	-98.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-1.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.64%	0.00%	-99.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.07%	-0.16%	-88.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	60.10%	0.02%	+60.08%

Volatility

MSOX vs. GSST - Volatility Comparison

Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 33.67% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) at 0.13%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSOX	GSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.67%	0.13%	+33.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	111.69%	0.41%	+111.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	219.64%	0.58%	+219.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	167.31%	0.63%	+166.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	167.31%	0.86%	+166.45%

MSOX vs. GSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GSST's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOX vs. GSST - Dividend Comparison

MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GSST Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.30%	4.56%	5.45%	4.98%	1.97%	0.71%	1.12%	1.66%
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOX and GSST in my portfolio?

MSOX and GSST have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSOX or GSST?

MSOX has higher volatility (33.67%) compared to GSST (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs GSST's -3.51%.

Which ETF is better, MSOX or GSST?

On 3-year performance, GSST leads with 5.47% vs -67.24% for MSOX. On fees, GSST is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, GSST has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSOX or GSST?

Over the 3-year period, GSST has performed better with a 5.47% return vs -67.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOX or GSST?

GSST is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MSOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOX or GSST?

GSST has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.

What is the main difference between MSOX and GSST?

MSOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GSST is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 0.16% for GSST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.69 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.