PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOS vs. GK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOS vs. GK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOS achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than GK's 13.03% return.


MSOS

1D
-3.85%
1M
1.58%
YTD
-4.66%
6M
-4.66%
1Y
118.45%
3Y*
-6.53%
5Y*
-35.42%
10Y*

GK

1D
-2.88%
1M
1.29%
YTD
13.03%
6M
11.47%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOS vs. GK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
-4.66%23.88%-45.65%0.29%-72.68%-37.25%
GK
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
13.03%17.78%20.10%21.19%-42.76%4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOS and GK is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021

0.32

MSOS vs. GK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSOS
GK

Real Estate

50.2%

-

Industrials

29.6%
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

17.8%
2.9%

Healthcare

2.5%
8.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

16.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.1%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

6.9%

Technology

-

37.9%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Real Estate

MSOS
50.2%
GK

-

Industrials

MSOS
29.6%
GK
16.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MSOS
17.8%
GK
2.9%

Healthcare

MSOS
2.5%
GK
8.0%

Basic Materials

MSOS

-

GK

-

Communication Services

MSOS

-

GK
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

MSOS

-

GK
2.1%

Energy

MSOS

-

GK

-

Financial Services

MSOS

-

GK
6.9%

Technology

MSOS

-

GK
37.9%

Utilities

MSOS

-

GK
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOS vs. GK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOS
MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

GK
GK Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GK Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GK Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOS vs. GK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSOSGKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.80

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

6.74

-2.53

MSOS vs. GK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOS Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the GK Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOS and GK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSOS vs. GK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOS drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than GK's maximum drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOS and GK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOSGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.25%

-47.72%

-48.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.91%

-15.13%

-37.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.71%

-23.62%

-58.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.80%

-4.03%

-87.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.87%

-23.77%

-48.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.27%

4.04%

+24.23%

Volatility

MSOS vs. GK - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a higher volatility of 22.12% compared to AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) at 8.10%. This indicates that MSOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOSGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.12%

8.10%

+14.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.66%

15.03%

+42.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

112.86%

18.71%

+94.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.15%

24.02%

+54.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.00%

24.02%

+49.98%

MSOS vs. GK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSOS vs. GK - Dividend Comparison

MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GK
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
0.07%0.08%0.00%0.13%1.30%0.04%
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSOS and GK have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSOS has higher volatility (22.12%) compared to GK (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOS dropped -96.25% vs GK's -47.72%.

On 3-year performance, GK leads with 18.34% vs -6.53% for MSOS. On fees, MSOS is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, GK has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GK has performed better with a 18.34% return vs -6.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSOS is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GK.

GK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.

MSOS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while GK is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MSOS and 0.75% for GK.

GK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOS and GK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer