PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOS vs. SNDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOS vs. SNDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOS achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly higher than SNDL's -15.66% return.


MSOS

1D
-6.21%
1M
5.64%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
3.08%
1Y
120.75%
3Y*
-5.30%
5Y*
-34.53%
10Y*

SNDL

1D
-1.41%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
-15.66%
6M
-21.79%
1Y
12.00%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
-32.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOS vs. SNDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
-0.85%23.88%-45.65%0.29%-72.68%-29.69%44.84%
SNDL
Sundial Growers Inc.
-15.66%-7.26%9.15%-21.53%-63.86%22.13%51.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOS and SNDL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2020

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOS vs. SNDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOS
MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SNDL
SNDL Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SNDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOS vs. SNDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSOSSNDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.10

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

0.22

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

0.33

+3.97

MSOS vs. SNDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOS Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the SNDL Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOS and SNDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSOS vs. SNDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOS drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, roughly equal to the maximum SNDL drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOS and SNDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOSSNDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.25%

-99.07%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.91%

-54.17%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.71%

-54.34%

-27.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.95%

-87.90%

-7.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.47%

-98.92%

+7.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.85%

-94.44%

+22.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.19%

35.99%

-7.80%

Volatility

MSOS vs. SNDL - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a higher volatility of 21.75% compared to Sundial Growers Inc. (SNDL) at 6.77%. This indicates that MSOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOSSNDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.75%

6.77%

+14.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.49%

30.79%

+34.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.00%

68.40%

+44.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.15%

70.52%

+7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.01%

114.79%

-40.78%

Dividends

MSOS vs. SNDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSOS nor SNDL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.27%
SNDL
Sundial Growers Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSOS and SNDL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSOS has higher volatility (21.75%) compared to SNDL (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOS dropped -96.25% vs SNDL's -99.07%.

MSOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOS and SNDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer