PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSMLX vs. EEMS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MSMLXEEMS
YTD Return-4.31%2.89%
1Y Return-6.80%8.86%
3Y Return (Ann)-9.45%0.23%
5Y Return (Ann)7.08%8.87%
10Y Return (Ann)1.64%4.77%
Sharpe Ratio-0.310.87
Sortino Ratio-0.321.23
Omega Ratio0.961.16
Calmar Ratio-0.181.21
Martin Ratio-1.094.58
Ulcer Index4.48%2.47%
Daily Std Dev15.62%13.07%
Max Drawdown-45.68%-48.89%
Current Drawdown-26.50%-7.74%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between MSMLX and EEMS is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

MSMLX vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MSMLX achieves a -4.31% return, which is significantly lower than EEMS's 2.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MSMLX has underperformed EEMS with an annualized return of 1.64%, while EEMS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.22%
-2.86%
MSMLX
EEMS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSMLX vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSMLX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMS's 0.69% expense ratio.


MSMLX
Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund
Expense ratio chart for MSMLX: current value at 1.37% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.37%
Expense ratio chart for EEMS: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSMLX vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSMLX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSMLX, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSMLX, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-0.32
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MSMLX, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.000.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSMLX, currently valued at -0.18, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-0.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MSMLX, currently valued at -1.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-1.09
EEMS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EEMS, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EEMS, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EEMS, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EEMS, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EEMS, currently valued at 4.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.58

MSMLX vs. EEMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSMLX Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the EEMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSMLX and EEMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.31
0.87
MSMLX
EEMS

Dividends

MSMLX vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison

MSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than EEMS's 2.50% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MSMLX
Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund
1.66%1.59%0.39%0.00%0.21%0.51%0.49%0.43%0.43%0.13%0.39%0.48%
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.50%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%2.67%2.15%

Drawdowns

MSMLX vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSMLX drawdown since its inception was -45.68%, smaller than the maximum EEMS drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMLX and EEMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-26.50%
-7.74%
MSMLX
EEMS

Volatility

MSMLX vs. EEMS - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) have volatilities of 4.06% and 3.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.06%
3.94%
MSMLX
EEMS