MSMLX vs. FIVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX).
MSMLX is managed by Matthews Asia Funds. It was launched on Sep 14, 2008. FIVFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1994.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MSMLX or FIVFX.
Key characteristics
| MSMLX | FIVFX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.31% | 9.80% |
| 1Y Return | -6.80% | 19.82% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.45% | -2.68% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.08% | 5.37% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.64% | 6.50% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.31 | 1.60 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.32 | 2.28 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.96 | 1.28 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.18 | 0.97 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.09 | 8.26 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.48% | 2.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.62% | 14.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.68% | -66.32% |
| Current Drawdown | -26.50% | -7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSMLX and FIVFX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MSMLX vs. FIVFX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MSMLX achieves a -4.31% return, which is significantly lower than FIVFX's 9.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MSMLX has underperformed FIVFX with an annualized return of 1.64%, while FIVFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.50% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSMLX vs. FIVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSMLX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FIVFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MSMLX vs. FIVFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) and Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MSMLX vs. FIVFX - Dividend Comparison
MSMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than FIVFX's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | 1.66% | 1.59% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.51% | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.43% | 0.13% | 0.39% | 0.48% |
FIVFX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.33% | 0.68% | 1.98% | 6.09% | 0.71% |
Drawdowns
MSMLX vs. FIVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSMLX drawdown since its inception was -45.68%, smaller than the maximum FIVFX drawdown of -66.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMLX and FIVFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MSMLX vs. FIVFX - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FIVFX) at 3.81%. This indicates that MSMLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.