MSII vs. XDSQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSII (REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSII returned -70.57% vs 15.05% for XDSQ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

MSII vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSII achieves a -28.10% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 3.05% return.

MSII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -30.37%
• YTD: -28.10%
• 6M: -30.19%
• 1Y: -70.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDSQ

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 3.05%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 14.47%
• 5Y*: 9.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSII vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF	-28.10%	-61.03%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	3.05%	12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MSII and XDSQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

MSII vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSII

MSII Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MSII Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSII Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSII Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MSII Martin Ratio Rank: 3

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 43
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSII vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSII	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	1.44	-2.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.76	1.99	-3.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.30	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	1.58	-2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.28	7.51	-8.79

MSII vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSII Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSII and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSII vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSII drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSII and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSII	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.73%	-26.06%	-52.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.73%	-9.60%	-69.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.65%	-0.03%	-76.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.49%	-4.91%	-42.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.34%	2.01%	+53.33%

Volatility

MSII vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) has a higher volatility of 21.17% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.62%. This indicates that MSII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSII	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.17%	0.62%	+20.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.72%	8.09%	+48.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.96%	10.50%	+61.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.62%	15.28%	+55.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.62%	15.02%	+55.60%

MSII vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSII vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

MSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 97.58%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF	97.58%	48.93%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSII and XDSQ in my portfolio?

MSII and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSII or XDSQ?

MSII has higher volatility (21.17%) compared to XDSQ (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSII dropped -78.73% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

Which ETF is better, MSII or XDSQ?

On 1-year performance, XDSQ leads with 15.05% vs -70.57% for MSII. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSII or XDSQ?

Over the 1-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 15.05% return vs -70.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSII or XDSQ?

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSII or XDSQ?

MSII has the higher dividend yield at 97.58%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

What is the main difference between MSII and XDSQ?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSII and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.