MSII vs. UGA
MSII (REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - MSII is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. MSII is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, MSII returned -67.78% vs 79.48% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. MSII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
MSII vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSII achieves a -18.95% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.
MSII
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -31.87%
- YTD
- -18.95%
- 6M
- -32.47%
- 1Y
- -67.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- 70.69%
- 6M
- 59.72%
- 1Y
- 79.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
MSII vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | -18.95% | -60.25% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 70.69% | 5.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSII and UGA is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSII vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
MSII
UGA
MSII vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSII | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.96 | 0.12 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
MSII vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSII drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSII and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSII | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.73% | -86.59% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.73% | -14.88% | -63.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.68% | -14.75% | -58.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.27% | -36.76% | -9.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.20% | — |
Volatility
MSII vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSII | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.12% | 35.27% | +35.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.12% | 34.40% | +36.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.12% | 37.27% | +33.85% |
MSII vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSII vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
MSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.00%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF | 88.00% | 48.93% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSII and UGA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 79.48% vs -67.78% for MSII. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 79.48% return vs -67.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSII.
MSII has the higher dividend yield at 88.00%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
MSII is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: REX and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSII and 0.75% for UGA.
Find the right allocation for MSII and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer