MSII vs. CIFG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSII (REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.

Performance

MSII vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSII achieves a -28.10% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 96.56% return.

MSII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -30.37%
• YTD: -28.10%
• 6M: -30.19%
• 1Y: -70.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFG

• 1D: -3.87%
• 1M: 42.24%
• YTD: 96.56%
• 6M: 67.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSII vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF	-28.10%	-16.77%
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	96.56%	-32.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MSII and CIFG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

MSII vs. CIFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSII

MSII Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MSII Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSII Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSII Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MSII Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CIFG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSII vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF (MSII) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSII	CIFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.76	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.28	—	—

Drawdowns

MSII vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSII drawdown since its inception was -78.73%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSII and CIFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSII	CIFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.73%	-71.71%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.65%	-10.44%	-66.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.49%	-35.54%	-11.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSII	CIFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.96%	205.93%	-133.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.62%	205.93%	-135.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.62%	205.93%	-135.31%

MSII vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSII vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison

MSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 97.58%, while CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MSII REX MSTR Growth & Income ETF	97.58%	48.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSII and CIFG in my portfolio?

MSII and CIFG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSII or CIFG?

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSII or CIFG?

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSII or CIFG?

MSII has the higher dividend yield at 97.58%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.

What is the main difference between MSII and CIFG?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSII and 0.75% for CIFG.