MSIF vs. PAA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MSC Income Fund, Inc. (MSIF) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA).

Performance

MSIF vs. PAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MSC Income Fund, Inc. (MSIF) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSIF vs. PAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSIF MSC Income Fund, Inc.	-4.49%	-8.32%
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.	27.03%	-5.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MSIF : $566.33M PAA : $15.76B
EPS MSIF : $1.90 PAA : $2.04
PE Ratio MSIF : 6.41 PAA : 10.95
PS Ratio MSIF : 5.54 PAA : 0.35
PB Ratio MSIF : 0.77 PAA : 1.60
Total Revenue (TTM) MSIF : $103.28M PAA : $44.80B
Gross Profit (TTM) MSIF : $68.07M PAA : $2.17B
EBITDA (TTM) MSIF : $84.02M PAA : $2.96B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSIF achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than PAA's 27.03% return.

MSIF

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: -4.49%
• 6M: -1.76%
• 1Y: -17.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PAA

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 6.79%
• YTD: 27.03%
• 6M: 36.78%
• 1Y: 21.75%
• 3Y*: 31.34%
• 5Y*: 29.02%
• 10Y*: 8.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MSIF vs. PAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSIF

MSIF Risk / Return Rank: 20
MSIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MSIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
MSIF Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MSIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
MSIF Martin Ratio Rank: 26

PAA

PAA Risk / Return Rank: 65
PAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
PAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
PAA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PAA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSIF vs. PAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MSC Income Fund, Inc. (MSIF) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSIF	PAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	0.90	-1.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.69	1.28	-1.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.18	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	0.98	-1.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	2.05	-2.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSIF vs. PAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSIF Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the PAA Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSIF and PAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSIF	PAA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58	0.90	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.36	0.30	-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between MSIF and PAA is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MSIF vs. PAA - Dividend Comparison

MSIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.82%, more than PAA's 6.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSIF MSC Income Fund, Inc.	11.82%	10.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.	6.97%	8.46%	7.44%	7.06%	7.08%	7.71%	10.92%	7.50%	5.99%	9.45%	8.21%	11.93%

Drawdowns

MSIF vs. PAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSIF drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum PAA drawdown of -91.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSIF and PAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSIF	PAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.63%	-91.99%	+61.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.63%	-20.96%	-9.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.62%	-12.09%	-12.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.40%	-25.87%	+10.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.21%	9.99%	+8.22%

Volatility

MSIF vs. PAA - Volatility Comparison

MSC Income Fund, Inc. (MSIF) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) at 5.97%. This indicates that MSIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSIF	PAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.68%	5.97%	+2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.22%	11.96%	+8.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.73%	24.36%	+6.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.94%	27.11%	+2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.94%	42.28%	-12.34%

Financials