PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFX vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSFX vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MSFX vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSFX
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF
-44.31%9.84%3.81%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
-4.89%14.22%22.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -44.31% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's -4.89% return.


MSFX

1D
6.35%
1M
-12.12%
YTD
-44.31%
6M
-54.13%
1Y
-19.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDSQ

1D
2.74%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSFX vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MSFX vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFX
MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFX vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFXXDSQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.36

0.77

-1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.20

1.22

-1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.20

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

1.19

-1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.86

5.87

-6.73

MSFX vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFX and XDSQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFXXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

0.77

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

0.60

-0.99

Correlation

The correlation between MSFX and XDSQ is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MSFX vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

MSFX vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and XDSQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFXXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.86%

-26.06%

-34.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.86%

-12.18%

-48.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.85%

-7.12%

-50.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.07%

-5.08%

-13.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.49%

2.47%

+22.02%

Volatility

MSFX vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) has a higher volatility of 13.18% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.65%. This indicates that MSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MSFXXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.18%

5.65%

+7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.27%

9.60%

+29.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.16%

17.99%

+35.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.79%

15.32%

+32.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.79%

15.32%

+32.47%