MSFX vs. DURA

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) and DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while DURA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. MSFX is actively managed, while DURA is passively managed. Over the past year, MSFX returned -48.16% vs 19.77% for DURA. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for DURA.

Performance

MSFX vs. DURA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -38.35% return, which is significantly lower than DURA's 15.02% return.

MSFX

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: 1.75%
• 6M: -30.56%
• YTD: -38.35%
• 1Y: -48.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DURA

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: 1.59%
• 6M: 10.84%
• YTD: 15.02%
• 1Y: 19.77%
• 3Y*: 10.28%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFX vs. DURA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF	-38.35%	9.84%	3.03%
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	15.02%	7.61%	7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFX and DURA is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.03

The correlation between MSFX and DURA shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MSFX vs. DURA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSFX	DURA
Technology	100.0%	11.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.9%
Communication Services	-	8.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	22.1%
Energy	-	13.8%
Financial Services	-	9.0%
Healthcare	-	14.3%
Industrials	-	6.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	6.6%

Return for Risk

MSFX vs. DURA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFX

MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 3
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

DURA

DURA Risk / Return Rank: 56
DURA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
DURA Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
DURA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DURA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
DURA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFX vs. DURA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFX	DURA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.88	1.34	-2.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.21	2.04	-3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.30	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	2.33	-3.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	9.08	-10.38

MSFX vs. DURA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the DURA Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFX and DURA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFX vs. DURA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -63.56%, which is greater than DURA's maximum drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and DURA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFX	DURA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.56%	-33.15%	-30.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.56%	-8.53%	-55.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.27%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.33%	-0.35%	-52.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.81%	-3.89%	-18.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.05%	2.18%	+34.87%

Volatility

MSFX vs. DURA - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) has a higher volatility of 21.20% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) at 3.83%. This indicates that MSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DURA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFX	DURA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.20%	3.83%	+17.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.30%	8.15%	+41.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.72%	14.82%	+39.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.30%	13.67%	+36.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.30%	16.92%	+33.38%

MSFX vs. DURA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than DURA's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFX vs. DURA - Dividend Comparison

MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, more than DURA's 3.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF	3.16%	3.59%	3.33%	3.58%	3.01%	2.89%	3.49%	3.83%	0.66%
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF	8.67%	5.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFX and DURA in my portfolio?

MSFX and DURA have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFX or DURA?

MSFX has higher volatility (21.20%) compared to DURA (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFX dropped -63.56% vs DURA's -33.15%.

Which ETF is better, MSFX or DURA?

On 1-year performance, DURA leads with 19.77% vs -48.16% for MSFX. On fees, DURA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DURA has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFX or DURA?

Over the 1-year period, DURA has performed better with a 19.77% return vs -48.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFX or DURA?

DURA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSFX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFX or DURA?

MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 3.16% for DURA.

What is the main difference between MSFX and DURA?

MSFX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DURA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 0.29% for DURA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DURA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.