MSFX vs. CRCD
MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. MSFX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.
Performance
MSFX vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -38.35% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -79.80% return.
MSFX
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- 6M
- -30.56%
- YTD
- -38.35%
- 1Y
- -48.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCD
- 1D
- 14.90%
- 1M
- 41.63%
- 6M
- -80.01%
- YTD
- -79.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFX vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -38.35% | -14.21% |
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -79.80% | 38.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFX and CRCD is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFX vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank
MSFX
CRCD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSFX vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFX | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFX vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -63.56%, smaller than the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and CRCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFX | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.56% | -96.95% | +33.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.33% | -90.42% | +37.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.81% | -60.01% | +37.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.05% | — | — |
Volatility
MSFX vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFX | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.72% | 200.70% | -145.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.30% | 200.70% | -150.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.30% | 200.70% | -150.40% |
MSFX vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFX vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison
MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, while CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 8.67% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFX and CRCD have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSFX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.
MSFX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRCD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 1.50% for CRCD.
Find the right allocation for MSFX and CRCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer