MSFX vs. CRCD
MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. MSFX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.
Performance
MSFX vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFX achieves a -28.34% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -88.01% return.
MSFX
- 1D
- -6.67%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- -28.34%
- 6M
- -29.12%
- 1Y
- -29.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCD
- 1D
- 20.12%
- 1M
- 35.97%
- YTD
- -88.01%
- 6M
- -87.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFX vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -28.34% | -15.65% |
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -88.01% | 43.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFX and CRCD is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFX vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank
MSFX
CRCD
MSFX vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFX | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFX | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | -0.45 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
MSFX vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFX drawdown since its inception was -60.86%, smaller than the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFX and CRCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFX | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.86% | -96.95% | +36.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.75% | -94.31% | +48.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -54.51% | +33.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.80% | — | — |
Volatility
MSFX vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFX | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.40% | 204.54% | -154.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.33% | 204.54% | -155.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.33% | 204.54% | -155.21% |
MSFX vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFX vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison
MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%, while CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 7.45% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFX and CRCD have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSFX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 7.45%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.
MSFX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRCD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSFX and 1.50% for CRCD.
Find the right allocation for MSFX and CRCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer