MSFW vs. PBP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP).

MSFW and PBP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSFW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jul 24, 2025. PBP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007.

Performance

MSFW vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSFW vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	-27.89%	-7.81%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	-1.04%	9.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -27.89% return, which is significantly lower than PBP's -1.04% return.

MSFW

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: -7.21%
• YTD: -27.89%
• 6M: -34.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBP

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: -1.04%
• 6M: 5.76%
• 1Y: 11.29%
• 3Y*: 10.74%
• 5Y*: 7.48%
• 10Y*: 6.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

MSFW

Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF

PBP

Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

Return for Risk

MSFW vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 56
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFW	PBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.50	0.32	-1.82

Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and PBP is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MSFW vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.11%, more than PBP's 11.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	38.11%	20.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.63%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFW	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.42%	-43.43%	+3.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.65%	-3.29%	-34.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.40%	-6.75%	-7.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.79%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSFW	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.19%	14.26%	+15.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.19%	11.95%	+18.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.19%	13.69%	+16.50%