PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFW vs. NVDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFW vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than NVDW's 15.96% return.


MSFW

1D
-3.61%
1M
4.05%
YTD
-14.73%
6M
-13.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDW

1D
-4.20%
1M
9.65%
YTD
15.96%
6M
20.80%
1Y
56.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and NVDW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFW vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFW

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFW vs. NVDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFWNVDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.76

1.52

-2.28

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than NVDW's maximum drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and NVDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFWNVDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.42%

-25.54%

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.27%

-10.65%

-15.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-8.19%

-9.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.49%

Volatility

MSFW vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFWNVDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.40%

41.15%

-8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.40%

41.15%

-8.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.40%

41.15%

-8.75%

MSFW vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSFW and NVDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

MSFW vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, less than NVDW's 58.16% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFW and NVDW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSFW and NVDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 58.16%, compared with 39.31% for MSFW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFW and NVDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer