MSFW vs. NVDW
MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSFW vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than NVDW's 15.96% return.
MSFW
- 1D
- -3.61%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- -14.73%
- 6M
- -13.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 56.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFW vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | -14.73% | -7.81% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 15.96% | 6.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFW and NVDW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFW vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank
MSFW
NVDW
MSFW vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFW | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 1.52 | -2.28 |
Drawdowns
MSFW vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than NVDW's maximum drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and NVDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFW | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -25.54% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.27% | -10.65% | -15.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -8.19% | -9.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.49% | — |
Volatility
MSFW vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFW | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.40% | 41.15% | -8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 41.15% | -8.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 41.15% | -8.75% |
MSFW vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSFW and NVDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSFW vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison
MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, less than NVDW's 58.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF | 39.31% | 20.25% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 58.16% | 38.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFW and NVDW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFW and NVDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 58.16%, compared with 39.31% for MSFW.
Find the right allocation for MSFW and NVDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer