NVDW vs. PLTW
NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDW returned 69.46% vs 8.66% for PLTW. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
NVDW vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDW achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -19.95% return.
NVDW
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 14.26%
- YTD
- 21.04%
- 6M
- 24.66%
- 1Y
- 69.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTW
- 1D
- -6.41%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- -19.95%
- 6M
- -16.70%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 21.04% | 40.00% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -19.95% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDW and PLTW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDW vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank
NVDW
PLTW
NVDW vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDW | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | 0.29 | +1.42 |
Drawdowns
NVDW vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -46.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and PLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDW | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.54% | -46.29% | +20.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | -46.29% | +20.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.74% | -34.53% | +27.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -19.50% | +11.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.08% | — |
Volatility
NVDW vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDW | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.99% | 61.22% | -20.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.99% | 72.61% | -31.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.99% | 72.61% | -31.62% |
NVDW vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NVDW and PLTW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
NVDW vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison
NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.71%, less than PLTW's 111.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 55.71% | 38.94% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 111.82% | 72.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDW and PLTW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 69.46% vs 8.66% for PLTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 69.46% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDW and PLTW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 111.82%, compared with 55.71% for NVDW.
Find the right allocation for NVDW and PLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer