PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDW vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDW vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVDW having a 12.95% return and NVDA slightly higher at 13.11%.


NVDW

1D
3.41%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
12.95%
6M
17.43%
1Y
48.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
2.95%
1M
-5.61%
YTD
13.11%
6M
16.55%
1Y
45.02%
3Y*
70.37%
5Y*
62.53%
10Y*
68.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDW vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NVDW
Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF
12.95%33.44%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
13.11%38.04%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDW and NVDA is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

0.99

The correlation between NVDW and NVDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDW vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDW vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDWNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.24

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

5.26

-0.83

NVDW vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDW and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDW vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDWNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.54%

-89.72%

+64.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.54%

-20.21%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.97%

-10.52%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-36.16%

+27.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.92%

8.58%

+2.34%

Volatility

NVDW vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a higher volatility of 14.75% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.86%. This indicates that NVDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDWNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.75%

12.86%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.14%

26.90%

+5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.23%

35.25%

+6.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.89%

51.79%

-9.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.89%

49.87%

-7.98%

Dividends

NVDW vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.74%, more than NVDA's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
NVDW
Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF
59.74%38.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, NVDW and NVDA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NVDW has higher volatility (14.75%) compared to NVDA (12.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDW dropped -25.54% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDW and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer