MSFW vs. FXN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSFW (Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF) and FXN (First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while FXN is a Energy Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Energy Index. MSFW is actively managed, while FXN is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. MSFW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FXN.

Performance

MSFW vs. FXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -14.73% return, which is significantly lower than FXN's 36.03% return.

MSFW

• 1D: -3.61%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: -14.73%
• 6M: -13.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FXN

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 36.03%
• 6M: 30.89%
• 1Y: 52.01%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: 17.30%
• 10Y*: 6.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. FXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	-14.73%	-7.81%
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund	36.03%	5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and FXN is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	-0.10

MSFW vs. FXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSFW	FXN
Technology	31.6%	4.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	95.4%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSFW vs. FXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXN

FXN Risk / Return Rank: 67
FXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FXN Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FXN Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. FXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFW	FXN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.76	0.06	-0.82

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. FXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, smaller than the maximum FXN drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and FXN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFW	FXN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.42%	-87.39%	+46.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.82%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.69%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.27%	-3.71%	-22.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.45%	-37.99%	+20.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSFW	FXN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.52%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.40%	23.55%	+8.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.40%	28.92%	+3.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.40%	35.00%	-2.60%

MSFW vs. FXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FXN's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFW vs. FXN - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.31%, more than FXN's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund	1.76%	2.53%	2.50%	3.09%	2.28%	0.87%	4.71%	1.47%	1.43%	1.17%	1.05%	2.36%
MSFW Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF	39.31%	20.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFW and FXN in my portfolio?

MSFW and FXN have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSFW or FXN?

On fees, FXN is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFW or FXN?

FXN is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFW or FXN?

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 39.31%, compared with 1.76% for FXN.

What is the main difference between MSFW and FXN?

MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while FXN is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.64% for FXN.