PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFW vs. CDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFW vs. CDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFW achieves a -29.51% return, which is significantly lower than CDL's 13.91% return.


MSFW

1D
-3.05%
1M
-15.28%
YTD
-29.51%
6M
-30.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CDL

1D
0.10%
1M
0.90%
YTD
13.91%
6M
13.24%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFW vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSFW and CDL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

-0.03

MSFW vs. CDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSFW
CDL

Technology

35.1%
8.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

15.8%

Energy

-

9.0%

Financial Services

-

23.1%

Healthcare

-

6.9%

Industrials

-

2.2%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

23.7%

Technology

MSFW
35.1%
CDL
8.0%

Basic Materials

MSFW

-

CDL
0.0%

Communication Services

MSFW

-

CDL
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

MSFW

-

CDL
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

MSFW

-

CDL
15.8%

Energy

MSFW

-

CDL
9.0%

Financial Services

MSFW

-

CDL
23.1%

Healthcare

MSFW

-

CDL
6.9%

Industrials

MSFW

-

CDL
2.2%

Real Estate

MSFW

-

CDL
0.0%

Utilities

MSFW

-

CDL
23.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFW vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFW vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSFW) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFWCDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

MSFW vs. CDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFW vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFW drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, roughly equal to the maximum CDL drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFW and CDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFWCDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.42%

-41.03%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.05%

-0.40%

-38.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.35%

-4.33%

-14.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

Volatility

MSFW vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFWCDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.77%

9.96%

+22.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.77%

13.85%

+18.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.77%

17.04%

+15.73%

MSFW vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CDL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFW vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison

MSFW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.19%, more than CDL's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.13%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
MSFW
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay™ ETF
50.19%20.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFW and CDL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFW.

MSFW has the higher dividend yield at 50.19%, compared with 3.13% for CDL.

MSFW is categorized as Derivative Income, while CDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFW and 0.35% for CDL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFW and CDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer