PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFU vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFU vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -27.75% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.


MSFU

1D
-6.29%
1M
5.53%
YTD
-27.75%
6M
-26.97%
1Y
-26.68%
3Y*
-0.38%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFU vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
-27.75%13.36%5.80%83.04%-13.28%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFU and VOO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between MSFU and VOO has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MSFU vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSFU
VOO

Technology

100.0%
35.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

MSFU
100.0%
VOO
35.7%

Basic Materials

MSFU

-

VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

MSFU

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MSFU

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

MSFU

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

MSFU

-

VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

MSFU

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

MSFU

-

VOO
8.5%

Industrials

MSFU

-

VOO
8.3%

Real Estate

MSFU

-

VOO
1.9%

Utilities

MSFU

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFU vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFU
MSFU Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFU Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFU Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFU vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFUVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.53

2.39

-2.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.48

3.25

-3.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.43

-0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

3.16

-3.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.86

14.73

-15.59

MSFU vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFU Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFU and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFUVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

2.39

-2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.89

-0.69

Drawdowns

MSFU vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFUVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.83%

-33.99%

-25.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.83%

-8.90%

-50.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.83%

-18.69%

-41.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.08%

-0.70%

-43.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.51%

-3.69%

-12.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.95%

1.91%

+29.04%

Volatility

MSFU vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) has a higher volatility of 19.77% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that MSFU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFUVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.77%

2.84%

+16.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.33%

8.90%

+36.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.14%

11.80%

+38.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.32%

16.81%

+29.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.32%

18.01%

+28.31%

MSFU vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFU vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
10.95%8.15%7.00%2.11%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFU and VOO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFU has higher volatility (19.77%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFU dropped -59.83% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.44% vs -0.38% for MSFU. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.44% return vs -0.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for MSFU.

MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 10.95%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

MSFU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. MSFU tracks Microsoft Corporation (150%), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for MSFU and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFU and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer