PortfoliosLab logo
MSFU vs. MSFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MSFU and MSFL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

MSFU vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.15%
-8.84%
MSFU
MSFL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MSFU:

0.13

MSFL:

0.16

Sortino Ratio

MSFU:

0.57

MSFL:

0.61

Omega Ratio

MSFU:

1.07

MSFL:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

MSFU:

0.14

MSFL:

0.18

Martin Ratio

MSFU:

0.29

MSFL:

0.36

Ulcer Index

MSFU:

24.15%

MSFL:

23.71%

Daily Std Dev

MSFU:

51.34%

MSFL:

51.45%

Max Drawdown

MSFU:

-48.11%

MSFL:

-47.70%

Current Drawdown

MSFU:

-24.36%

MSFL:

-23.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than MSFL's 0.26% return.


MSFU

YTD

-0.86%

1M

42.05%

6M

2.87%

1Y

-1.86%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MSFL

YTD

0.26%

1M

42.51%

6M

4.20%

1Y

-0.38%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSFU vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for MSFL: current value is 1.15%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
MSFL: 1.15%
Expense ratio chart for MSFU: current value is 1.04%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
MSFU: 1.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSFU vs. MSFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFU is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFU is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFU is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFU is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFU is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFU is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFL is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFL is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFL is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFL is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFL is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFL is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSFU vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSFU, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
MSFU: 0.13
MSFL: 0.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSFU, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
MSFU: 0.57
MSFL: 0.61
The chart of Omega ratio for MSFU, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
MSFU: 1.07
MSFL: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSFU, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
MSFU: 0.14
MSFL: 0.18
The chart of Martin ratio for MSFU, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
MSFU: 0.29
MSFL: 0.36

The current MSFU Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is comparable to the MSFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFU and MSFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.20Mar 23Mar 30Apr 06Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27
0.13
0.16
MSFU
MSFL

Dividends

MSFU vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, while MSFL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022
MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
6.96%7.00%2.11%0.54%
MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MSFU vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -48.11%, roughly equal to the maximum MSFL drawdown of -47.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and MSFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-24.36%
-23.11%
MSFU
MSFL

Volatility

MSFU vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) have volatilities of 29.31% and 29.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
29.31%
29.33%
MSFU
MSFL