MSFU vs. MSFT
MSFU (Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Microsoft Corporation (150%), while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, MSFU returned -10.09%/yr vs 3.92%/yr for MSFT. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep.
Performance
MSFU vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -47.25% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -23.71% return.
MSFU
- 1D
- -6.29%
- 1M
- -24.51%
- YTD
- -47.25%
- 6M
- -47.70%
- 1Y
- -49.25%
- 3Y*
- -10.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT
- 1D
- -3.18%
- 1M
- -12.24%
- YTD
- -23.71%
- 6M
- -23.91%
- 1Y
- -22.44%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 23.62%
MSFU vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | -47.25% | 13.36% | 5.80% | 83.04% | -13.28% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -23.71% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -5.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFU and MSFT is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022 | 0.99 |
The correlation between MSFU and MSFT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFU vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
MSFU
MSFT
MSFU vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFU | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.66 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | -1.32 | -0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFU vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFU | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.83% | -69.38% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.83% | -33.91% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.83% | -33.91% | -25.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.17% | -31.80% | -27.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -21.79% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.98% | 16.97% | +16.01% |
Volatility
MSFU vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) has a higher volatility of 22.08% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 11.08%. This indicates that MSFU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFU | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.08% | 11.08% | +11.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.50% | 22.93% | +23.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.94% | 26.01% | +25.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.60% | 26.78% | +19.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.60% | 27.11% | +19.49% |
Dividends
MSFU vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.00%, more than MSFT's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.97% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | 15.00% | 8.15% | 7.00% | 2.11% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, MSFU and MSFT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MSFU has higher volatility (22.08%) compared to MSFT (11.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFU dropped -59.83% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.87 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFU and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer