PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFU vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFU vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -22.90% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return.


MSFU

1D
-8.36%
1M
12.13%
YTD
-22.90%
6M
-25.88%
1Y
-21.45%
3Y*
1.80%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
0.46%
1M
10.68%
YTD
21.62%
6M
20.27%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
21.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFU vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
-22.90%13.36%5.80%83.04%-13.28%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.62%20.77%25.58%54.86%-10.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFU and QQQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between MSFU and QQQ has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MSFU vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSFU
QQQ

Technology

100.0%
53.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

MSFU
100.0%
QQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

MSFU

-

QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

MSFU

-

QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MSFU

-

QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

MSFU

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

MSFU

-

QQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

MSFU

-

QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

MSFU

-

QQQ
4.2%

Industrials

MSFU

-

QQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

MSFU

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

MSFU

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFU vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFU
MSFU Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFU Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFU vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFUQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.43

2.73

-3.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.30

3.55

-3.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.47

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

3.71

-4.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.67

14.30

-14.97

MSFU vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFU Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFU and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFUQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

2.73

-3.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.41

-0.18

Drawdowns

MSFU vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFUQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.83%

-82.97%

+23.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.83%

-11.96%

-47.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.83%

-22.77%

-37.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.32%

0.00%

-40.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.48%

-32.79%

+16.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.83%

3.11%

+27.72%

Volatility

MSFU vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) has a higher volatility of 18.49% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.48%. This indicates that MSFU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFUQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.49%

4.48%

+14.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.94%

12.11%

+32.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.77%

15.95%

+33.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.23%

22.39%

+23.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.23%

22.30%

+23.93%

MSFU vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFU vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
10.26%8.15%7.00%2.11%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFU and QQQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFU has higher volatility (18.49%) compared to QQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFU dropped -59.83% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.89% vs 1.80% for MSFU. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.89% return vs 1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for MSFU.

MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

MSFU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. MSFU tracks Microsoft Corporation (150%), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for MSFU and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFU and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer