MSFO vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF ) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. MSFO is actively managed, while XLG is passively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -20.61% vs 17.97% for XLG. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

MSFO vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -20.82% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 1.11% return.

MSFO

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -12.27%
• YTD: -20.82%
• 6M: -21.32%
• 1Y: -20.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: -0.07%
• 1Y: 17.97%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 14.13%
• 10Y*: 16.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFO vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	-20.82%	15.69%	10.34%	18.74%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	1.11%	19.51%	33.49%	9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFO and XLG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2023	0.67

The correlation between MSFO and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSFO vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFO

MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 1

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 37
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFO vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFO	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	1.30	-2.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.19	1.80	-2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.23	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	1.45	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	5.15	-6.60

MSFO vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFO Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFO and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFO vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFO	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.29%	-52.39%	+23.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.29%	-12.41%	-16.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.44%	-7.36%	-20.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.87%	-7.63%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.22%	3.50%	+10.72%

Volatility

MSFO vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.03%. This indicates that MSFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFO	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.64%	5.03%	+4.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.00%	10.69%	+9.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.49%	13.95%	+8.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.01%	18.79%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.01%	18.87%	+1.14%

MSFO vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFO vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.46%, more than XLG's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	47.46%	33.91%	35.15%	6.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.66%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFO and XLG in my portfolio?

MSFO and XLG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFO or XLG?

MSFO has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to XLG (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.29% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, MSFO or XLG?

On 1-year performance, XLG leads with 17.97% vs -20.61% for MSFO. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFO or XLG?

Over the 1-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.97% return vs -20.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFO or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFO or XLG?

MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 47.46%, compared with 0.66% for XLG.

What is the main difference between MSFO and XLG?

MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while XLG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFO and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.