MSFO vs. MSFY
MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF) and MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while MSFY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -8.12% vs -13.97% for MSFY. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MSFO charges 1.03%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for MSFY.
Performance
MSFO vs. MSFY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -3.96% return, which is significantly higher than MSFY's -10.88% return.
MSFO
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 15.44%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- -3.96%
- 1Y
- -8.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.66%
MSFY
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 15.01%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- -10.88%
- 1Y
- -13.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $984.76K | $840.67K | $1.06M | |
| $248.37K | $216.41K | $271.72K |
MSFO vs. MSFY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF | -3.96% | 15.69% | 10.34% | 7.92% |
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | -10.88% | 14.11% | 10.88% | 2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFO and MSFY is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between MSFO and MSFY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFO vs. MSFY — Risk / Return Rank
MSFO
MSFY
MSFO vs. MSFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFO | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.94 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | -0.42 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | -0.77 | +0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFO vs. MSFY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum MSFY drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and MSFY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFO | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -35.65% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.65% | -35.65% | +6.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.00% | -17.66% | +5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -8.42% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 19.11% | -2.97% |
Volatility
MSFO vs. MSFY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) have volatilities of 13.86% and 14.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFO | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.86% | 14.33% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.95% | 27.28% | -4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.49% | 32.55% | -5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 24.55% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 24.55% | -2.80% |
MSFO vs. MSFY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFY's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFO vs. MSFY - Dividend Comparison
MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.39%, more than MSFY's 23.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF | 36.39% | 33.91% | 35.15% | 6.44% |
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | 23.50% | 18.56% | 14.35% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, MSFO and MSFY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MSFY has higher volatility (14.33%) compared to MSFO (13.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.65% vs MSFY's -35.65%.
On 1-year performance, MSFO leads with -8.12% vs -13.97% for MSFY. On fees, MSFY is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, MSFO has been the lower-risk option at 13.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSFO has performed better with a -8.12% return vs -13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSFY is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for MSFO.
MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 36.39%, compared with 23.50% for MSFY.
MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while MSFY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for MSFO and 1.00% for MSFY.
MSFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFO and MSFY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer