MSFO vs. GPIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF ) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -18.84% vs 24.71% for GPIX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.

Performance

MSFO vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -20.43% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 9.41% return.

MSFO

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: -11.85%
• YTD: -20.43%
• 6M: -20.69%
• 1Y: -18.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 9.41%
• 6M: 9.08%
• 1Y: 24.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFO vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	-20.43%	15.69%	10.34%	9.58%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	9.41%	16.25%	21.77%	13.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFO and GPIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.59

The correlation between MSFO and GPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSFO vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFO

MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 3
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFO vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFO	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	2.31	-3.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.07	3.16	-4.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.44	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	3.22	-3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	15.72	-17.06

MSFO vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFO Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFO and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFO vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFO	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.29%	-17.50%	-11.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.29%	-7.71%	-21.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.09%	-0.93%	-26.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.81%	-1.48%	-5.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.03%	1.58%	+12.45%

Volatility

MSFO vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) has a higher volatility of 9.18% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 4.04%. This indicates that MSFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFO	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.18%	4.04%	+5.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.86%	8.65%	+11.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.37%	10.75%	+11.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.96%	13.87%	+6.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.96%	13.87%	+6.09%

MSFO vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFO vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.23%, more than GPIX's 8.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	8.03%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	47.23%	33.91%	35.15%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFO and GPIX in my portfolio?

MSFO and GPIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFO or GPIX?

MSFO has higher volatility (9.18%) compared to GPIX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.29% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

Which ETF is better, MSFO or GPIX?

On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 24.71% vs -18.84% for MSFO. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFO or GPIX?

Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 24.71% return vs -18.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFO or GPIX?

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFO or GPIX?

MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 47.23%, compared with 8.03% for GPIX.

What is the main difference between MSFO and GPIX?

MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFO and 0.29% for GPIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.