MSFO vs. FBY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF ) and FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while FBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -17.30% vs -8.88% for FBY. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

MSFO vs. FBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -16.34% return, which is significantly lower than FBY's -1.74% return.

MSFO

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: -15.04%
• YTD: -16.34%
• 1Y: -17.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBY

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: 13.32%
• 6M: 0.55%
• YTD: -1.74%
• 1Y: -8.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFO vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	-16.34%	15.69%	10.34%	18.74%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-1.74%	1.98%	44.42%	28.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFO and FBY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2023	0.49

Return for Risk

MSFO vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFO

MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 4
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 7
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFO vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFO	FBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	-0.28	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.92	-0.19	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.98	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.59	-0.30	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.14	-0.58	-0.56

MSFO vs. FBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFO Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the FBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFO and FBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFO vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, smaller than the maximum FBY drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and FBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFO	FBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.65%	-31.53%	+1.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.65%	-29.50%	-0.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.34%	-15.55%	-7.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-8.34%	+1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.26%	15.34%	-0.08%

Volatility

MSFO vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is 9.07%, while YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) has a volatility of 13.11%. This indicates that MSFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFO	FBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.07%	13.11%	-4.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.91%	26.01%	-5.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.42%	31.80%	-8.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.22%	29.24%	-9.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.22%	29.24%	-9.02%

MSFO vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSFO and FBY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

MSFO vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison

MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.86%, less than FBY's 53.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	53.81%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	42.86%	33.91%	35.15%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFO and FBY in my portfolio?

MSFO and FBY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFO or FBY?

FBY has higher volatility (13.11%) compared to MSFO (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.65% vs FBY's -31.53%.

Which ETF is better, MSFO or FBY?

On 1-year performance, FBY leads with -8.88% vs -17.30% for MSFO. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MSFO has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFO or FBY?

Over the 1-year period, FBY has performed better with a -8.88% return vs -17.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFO or FBY?

MSFO and FBY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFO or FBY?

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 53.81%, compared with 42.86% for MSFO.

What is the main difference between MSFO and FBY?

MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while FBY is Derivative Income.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.