MSFL vs. SPUU

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

MSFL (GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MSFL is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. Over the past year, MSFL returned -55.20% vs 39.60% for SPUU. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.

Performance

MSFL vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFL achieves a -51.34% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 13.24% return.

MSFL

• 1D: -7.03%
• 1M: -29.70%
• YTD: -51.34%
• 6M: -52.32%
• 1Y: -55.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPUU

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -4.55%
• YTD: 13.24%
• 6M: 10.22%
• 1Y: 39.60%
• 3Y*: 34.71%
• 5Y*: 18.25%
• 10Y*: 25.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFL vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	-51.34%	16.99%	-8.21%
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF	13.24%	26.55%	26.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFL and SPUU is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024	0.60

The correlation between MSFL and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MSFL vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSFL	SPUU
Technology	66.6%	39.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.1%
Financial Services	-	11.1%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

MSFL vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFL

MSFL Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MSFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSFL Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MSFL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

SPUU

SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 52
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFL vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFL	SPUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.06	1.59	-2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	2.11	-3.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.28	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	2.19	-3.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.66	9.22	-10.88

MSFL vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFL Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFL and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFL vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -62.08%, roughly equal to the maximum SPUU drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and SPUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFL	SPUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.08%	-59.35%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.08%	-18.19%	-43.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.08%	-6.69%	-55.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.38%	-9.48%	-12.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.27%	4.31%	+28.96%

Volatility

MSFL vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a higher volatility of 23.64% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 9.51%. This indicates that MSFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFL	SPUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.64%	9.51%	+14.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.15%	19.81%	+27.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.46%	25.05%	+27.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.17%	33.67%	+16.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.17%	35.79%	+14.38%

MSFL vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFL vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

MSFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF	1.39%	1.63%	0.55%	0.83%	0.88%	3.04%	8.03%	1.80%	5.50%	6.96%	8.08%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFL and SPUU in my portfolio?

MSFL and SPUU have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFL or SPUU?

MSFL has higher volatility (23.64%) compared to SPUU (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFL dropped -62.08% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

Which ETF is better, MSFL or SPUU?

On 1-year performance, SPUU leads with 39.60% vs -55.20% for MSFL. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 9.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFL or SPUU?

Over the 1-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 39.60% return vs -55.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFL or SPUU?

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for MSFL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFL or SPUU?

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for MSFL.

What is the main difference between MSFL and SPUU?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for MSFL and 0.60% for SPUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.