PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSFL vs. APLY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MSFLAPLY
Daily Std Dev38.86%16.47%
Max Drawdown-29.48%-15.85%
Current Drawdown-17.08%-4.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between MSFL and APLY is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MSFL vs. APLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-3.38%
14.45%
MSFL
APLY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MSFL vs. APLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than APLY's 0.99% expense ratio.


MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for MSFL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for APLY: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSFL vs. APLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFL
Sharpe ratio
No data
APLY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for APLY, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for APLY, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for APLY, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for APLY, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.99
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for APLY, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.003.13

MSFL vs. APLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

MSFL vs. APLY - Dividend Comparison

MSFL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.00%.


TTM2023
MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
26.00%14.36%

Drawdowns

MSFL vs. APLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, which is greater than APLY's maximum drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and APLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-17.08%
-4.00%
MSFL
APLY

Volatility

MSFL vs. APLY - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) at 4.67%. This indicates that MSFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
10.42%
4.67%
MSFL
APLY