MSFL vs. QTAP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

MSFL (GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFL returned -55.20% vs 21.83% for QTAP. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSFL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

MSFL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFL achieves a -51.34% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.22% return.

MSFL

• 1D: -7.03%
• 1M: -29.70%
• YTD: -51.34%
• 6M: -52.32%
• 1Y: -55.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: 13.22%
• 6M: 13.12%
• 1Y: 21.83%
• 3Y*: 20.17%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	-51.34%	16.99%	-8.21%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	13.22%	19.36%	15.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFL and QTAP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between MSFL and QTAP has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MSFL vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSFL	QTAP
Technology	66.6%	50.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.7%
Energy	-	0.7%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	5.1%
Industrials	-	3.3%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

MSFL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFL

MSFL Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MSFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSFL Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MSFL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFL	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.06	3.62	-4.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	5.88	-7.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.91	-1.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	8.80	-9.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.66	48.87	-50.53

MSFL vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFL Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFL and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFL drawdown since its inception was -62.08%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFL and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFL	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.08%	-29.44%	-32.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.08%	-2.49%	-59.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.08%	-1.36%	-60.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.38%	-4.99%	-17.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.27%	0.45%	+32.82%

Volatility

MSFL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a higher volatility of 23.64% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 3.01%. This indicates that MSFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFL	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.64%	3.01%	+20.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.15%	4.94%	+42.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.46%	6.05%	+46.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.17%	18.92%	+31.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.17%	18.70%	+31.47%

MSFL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSFL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFL and QTAP in my portfolio?

MSFL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFL or QTAP?

MSFL has higher volatility (23.64%) compared to QTAP (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFL dropped -62.08% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, MSFL or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 21.83% vs -55.20% for MSFL. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFL or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 21.83% return vs -55.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFL or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for MSFL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFL or QTAP?

MSFL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MSFL and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for MSFL and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.