MSEA.L vs. WRDA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MSEA.L (UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - MSEA.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Index, while WRDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. MSEA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for WRDA.L.

Performance

MSEA.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MSEA.L

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 7.55%
• 6M: 8.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WRDA.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MSEA.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSEA.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.99	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MSEA.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSEA.L	WRDA.L	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.18%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.18%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	—	—

MSEA.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MSEA.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSEA.L nor WRDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MSEA.L or WRDA.L?

On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSEA.L or WRDA.L?

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for MSEA.L.

What is the main difference between MSEA.L and WRDA.L?

MSEA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while WRDA.L is Global Equities. MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.