MSEA.L vs. UC63.L
MSEA.L (UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A) and UC63.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis) are both Europe Equities funds from UBS - MSEA.L tracks the MSCI Europe Index while UC63.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSEA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for UC63.L.
Performance
MSEA.L vs. UC63.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSEA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than UC63.L's 5.83% return.
MSEA.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UC63.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 21.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
MSEA.L vs. UC63.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 7.55% | 7.48% |
UC63.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 5.83% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSEA.L and UC63.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSEA.L vs. UC63.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSEA.L
UC63.L
MSEA.L vs. UC63.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSEA.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 0.48 | +1.50 |
Drawdowns
MSEA.L vs. UC63.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSEA.L drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, smaller than the maximum UC63.L drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEA.L and UC63.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEA.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -34.55% | +24.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -4.19% | +3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -4.76% | +2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
MSEA.L vs. UC63.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSEA.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 11.19% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 12.88% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 15.11% | +0.07% |
MSEA.L vs. UC63.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UC63.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MSEA.L vs. UC63.L - Dividend Comparison
MSEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC63.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC63.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 2.87% | 2.73% | 3.12% | 3.69% | 3.71% | 3.22% | 3.86% | 4.21% | 3.55% | 4.46% | 2.14% | 4.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSEA.L and UC63.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSEA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSEA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC63.L.
MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while UC63.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.20% for UC63.L.
Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and UC63.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer