PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRDA.L vs. XMWX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WRDA.L vs. XMWX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WRDA.L vs. XMWX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WRDA.L
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc
-1.39%12.77%7.76%
XMWX.L
Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C
5.10%14.39%3.50%
Different Trading Currencies

WRDA.L is traded in GBp, while XMWX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMWX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRDA.L achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than XMWX.L's 5.10% return.


WRDA.L

1D
1.76%
1M
-3.44%
YTD
-1.39%
6M
2.20%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMWX.L

1D
2.42%
1M
-2.68%
YTD
5.10%
6M
10.51%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WRDA.L vs. XMWX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRDA.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XMWX.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

WRDA.L vs. XMWX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRDA.L
WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

XMWX.L
XMWX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XMWX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMWX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMWX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XMWX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMWX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRDA.L vs. XMWX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRDA.LXMWX.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

1.84

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.30

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.58

8.18

+1.40

WRDA.L vs. XMWX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the XMWX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRDA.L and XMWX.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRDA.LXMWX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

1.07

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between WRDA.L and XMWX.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

WRDA.L vs. XMWX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WRDA.L nor XMWX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WRDA.L vs. XMWX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRDA.L drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than XMWX.L's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRDA.L and XMWX.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WRDA.LXMWX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-12.53%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-9.75%

-0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.67%

-5.53%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-1.60%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

2.48%

-0.72%

Volatility

WRDA.L vs. XMWX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) is 4.18%, while Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C (XMWX.L) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that WRDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMWX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WRDA.LXMWX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

6.61%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

10.49%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

14.21%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.54%

13.71%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.54%

13.71%

-1.17%