PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSEA.L vs. 5ESG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSEA.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSEA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than 5ESG.L's 9.48% return.


MSEA.L

1D
0.46%
1M
3.69%
YTD
7.55%
6M
8.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

5ESG.L

1D
0.70%
1M
4.76%
YTD
9.48%
6M
10.78%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSEA.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSEA.L and 5ESG.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSEA.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSEA.L

5ESG.L
5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSEA.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSEA.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSEA.L5ESG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.99

1.05

+0.94

Drawdowns

MSEA.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSEA.L drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, smaller than the maximum 5ESG.L drawdown of -31.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEA.L and 5ESG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSEA.L5ESG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.45%

-31.50%

+21.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.07%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.48%

-5.69%

+3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

Volatility

MSEA.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSEA.L5ESG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

11.46%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

16.54%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

19.13%

-3.95%

MSEA.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MSEA.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison

MSEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
0.62%0.87%0.47%1.07%1.32%0.89%1.25%0.39%
MSEA.L
UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSEA.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSEA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSEA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for 5ESG.L.

MSEA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while 5ESG.L is S&P 500. MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and 5ESG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer