WRDA.L vs. ACWI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L).
WRDA.L and ACWI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WRDA.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Aug 5, 2025. ACWI.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 13, 2011. Both WRDA.L and ACWI.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WRDA.L vs. ACWI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WRDA.L vs. ACWI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | -3.09% | 12.77% | 20.02% |
ACWI.L SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF | -2.48% | 14.32% | 18.83% |
Different Trading Currencies
WRDA.L is traded in GBp, while ACWI.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ACWI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRDA.L achieves a -3.09% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI.L's -2.48% return.
WRDA.L
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 16.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WRDA.L vs. ACWI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRDA.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WRDA.L vs. ACWI.L — Risk / Return Rank
WRDA.L
ACWI.L
WRDA.L vs. ACWI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRDA.L | ACWI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.74 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.55 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | 6.71 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRDA.L | ACWI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.74 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between WRDA.L and ACWI.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WRDA.L vs. ACWI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WRDA.L nor ACWI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WRDA.L vs. ACWI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRDA.L drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum ACWI.L drawdown of -25.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRDA.L and ACWI.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRDA.L | ACWI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -25.44% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -10.51% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -5.97% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -3.70% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.42% | -0.08% |
Volatility
WRDA.L vs. ACWI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) is 3.91%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that WRDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WRDA.L | ACWI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 4.35% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 8.12% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.66% | 14.03% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 13.05% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 14.38% | -1.88% |