MSEA.L vs. FLXD.L
MSEA.L (UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A) and FLXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - MSEA.L tracks the MSCI Europe Index while FLXD.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSEA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FLXD.L.
Performance
MSEA.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSEA.L is traded in GBp, while FLXD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSEA.L achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than FLXD.L's 9.29% return.
MSEA.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXD.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- —
MSEA.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 7.55% | 7.48% |
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 9.29% | 4.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSEA.L and FLXD.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSEA.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSEA.L
FLXD.L
MSEA.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSEA.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 0.64 | +1.35 |
Drawdowns
MSEA.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSEA.L drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, smaller than the maximum FLXD.L drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEA.L and FLXD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEA.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -29.71% | +19.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -2.77% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -4.13% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.30% | — |
Volatility
MSEA.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSEA.L | FLXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 8.52% | +6.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 10.85% | +4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 12.91% | +2.27% |
MSEA.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MSEA.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison
MSEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 4.37% | 4.90% | 5.18% | 5.75% | 5.87% | 5.51% | 3.90% | 1.53% | 1.09% |
MSEA.L UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSEA.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSEA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSEA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXD.L.
MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.25% for FLXD.L.
Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and FLXD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer