PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSEA.L vs. UC15.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSEA.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UC15.L

1D
-0.94%
1M
0.14%
YTD
20.68%
6M
19.90%
1Y
30.11%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSEA.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSEA.L

UC15.L
UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSEA.LUC15.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

Drawdowns

MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSEA.LUC15.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

Volatility

MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSEA.LUC15.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSEA.L nor UC15.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, MSEA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSEA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.

MSEA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UC15.L is Commodities. MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and UC15.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer