MSEA.L vs. UC15.L
MSEA.L (UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - MSEA.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Index, while UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. MSEA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.
Performance
MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSEA.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UC15.L
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 20.68%
- 6M
- 19.90%
- 1Y
- 30.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSEA.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSEA.L
UC15.L
MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF Capitalisation A (MSEA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSEA.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.01 | — |
Drawdowns
MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSEA.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -98.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -4.18% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -17.24% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.28% | — |
Volatility
MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSEA.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.04% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 19.60% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.37% | — |
MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSEA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSEA.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSEA.L nor UC15.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MSEA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSEA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.
MSEA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UC15.L is Commodities. MSEA.L tracks MSCI Europe Index, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for MSEA.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.
Find the right allocation for MSEA.L and UC15.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer